This is not an answer this is a question and you've been very helpfull to me.I have a Dell machine that the processers are 86 meaning 32 my current OS in XP pro I'm updateing to Window 7 64 bit sp1 pro.Then I plan on getting Prem Pro CS6. I'm looking at the specs it saying I need a 64 bit processer talk to Adobe Tech they said everything would be fine I don't get it. Seem like I've got a problem. If CS6 won't work will CS4 work using the windows 7 pro in 32 bit modeThink that covers itThank you. Unfortunately, it's too old to run Premiere Pro CS6 - and also below Adobe's stated minimum requirements.
The Pentium D is based on the now-very-obsolete NetBurst technology (used on the original Pentium 4), and it is extremely inefficient (in terms of performance per clock cycle). Adobe requires a Core 2 Duo (or a Core 2-based Pentium Dual-Core, not to be confused with the archaic Pentium D) at an absolute minimum to run Premiere Pro CS6 at all.
Long live the king!' Artist: ColdplaySong: Viva La VidaI used to rule the worldSeas would rise when I gave the wordNow in the morning I sleep aloneSweep the streets I used to ownI used to roll the diceFeel the fear in my enemy's eyesListen as the crowd would sing'Now the old king is dead!
Download premiere pro cs6 32 bit for free. Multimedia tools downloads - Adobe Premiere Pro by Adobe Systems Incorporated and many more programs are. System Requirement Adobe Premiere Pro CS6: Intel® Core™2 Duo or AMD Phenom® II processor; 64-bit support required Microsoft® Windows® 7 with.
But because of its 64-bit-exclusive operation, a Core i5 or higher is better if you're going to run CS6 at all.As for CS4, the Pentium D still barely meets Adobe's practical minimum requirements for HDV, and insufficient for AVCHD. Thank you for a clear answer my CS 4 Runs except for a sometime crash but I've learned to live with it.
What I wanted to avoid is formating my computer to Window 7 64bit Pro and discovering CS 4 would not work any longer which is something the Windows 7 advisor said and I need to upgrade but now I see that is not possible.As I mentioned Adobe said CS6 would work I did not believe them and to format and discover I had to go back to XP would be a waist of time.Final question of the day will CS4 run on Windows 7 64 bit Pro under XP Mode if it won't I'm not installing Windows 7 and leaving things as they are.Thank you. Net tv plus player crack 2017. Thank you I do not know or understand this stuff I do my best with what I have.
Your comment on is it worth the effort seem if I did do this I'd be waisting my time. Since I gain nothing switching to Window 7 it would seem point less to install it other than the fact Windows XP will soon be a discontinued support item in the near future. I'd do it if I knew Pre Pro CS 4 would work thought what do you think would it. Love to buy new one but with what I do there's no great point in doing that I know it's old but it works great.Someone tell me will PP CS 4 work on it Windows 7 sp 1 64 bit even though it may not be a great move if it will work even to a slight advantageor should I get the 32bitSorry this is the only way I know how to get the answersThank you. Reese,The system you currently have is very outdated. I had a similar outdated server (2004) here that died the other day and the only solution was to get a new one.
It made no sense to replace parts, the costs would have been too high in relation to getting it back up on its feet, so I decided to get a new server. You are in a somewhat similar situation. One of these days your system will die of old-age. Well, that is the major risk of being born, sometime in the future you will die. Being born is deadly, just like smoking if we believe the statements on cigarette packs.The best approach I can offer is to start saving for a new system. Let your old system run as it is, don't invest time or money to keep it going. Instead have a look at some of the FAQ articles, likeAnother way to show you about planning for the future is here:My editing system is getting pretty old and I know I need to replace it sometime in the (not too distant) future, so I plan ahead and consider all my options.
Sure, this is not a system for everybody and likely it will end up in the € 7 K range, but I show it to give you an example of how you might go about building a new system.I realize you may not be up to speed with all the technical jargon, but if you take your time reading these pages, it may help you to get acquainted with the basics you need to know for a new system. I have something with Dell:. They have a great price/quality if you select a base system and do not add anything. They steal you blind if you add anything to the base configuration.
They can not deliver a video editing system because that is not their target market. They cripple their BIOS, so they can not be overclocked. They make life miserable with custom connectors instead of standard molex connectors.FYI, I just bought a Dell Precision T410 server with dual Xeon E5620 CPU's, 16 GB RAM and 2 x 500 GB disks, no extended service, no OS, nothing else for € 1,315 which seems reasonable. All the rest I did myself (well, more accurately, my son did it). Installed an old LSI PERC raid controller, added 5 x 1 TB disks and a DVD burner from the old server and installed ISXi 5.1 on a USB stick and it is running nicely.If you want to get a video editing system and do not want to build it yourself, forget about Dell, go to and ask for Eric Bowen.
Harm Millaard wrote:FYI, I just bought a Dell Precision T410 server.If you want to get a video editing system and do not want to build it yourself, forget about Dell, go to and ask for Eric Bowen.Harm, why didn't you buy a server from ADK? Well OK, they don't make servers - then not from a customer server shop? (with SuperMicro, Asus, Tyan, EVGA COTS components)? Cheaper, no custom un-molex hell.Right, few others have on-site warranty, the quality of engineering that goes into that server, warranty options, maintenance and monitoring options. Same with HP.You don't think some of those factors could apply to an editing system? Fortunately, but this only applies to me, not to the average person, I don't need on-site warranty, maintenance and monitoring from third parties, whether Dell, HP or whatever name, I have the support on-site. My son helps Dell, HP, and a number of other companies with their server problems, not the other way around.
This is lucky for me and not the average situation.For an editing system you are best served with a company that KNOWS what editing entails like ADK. Unfortunately Dell, HP, and name a lot of others have no idea what video editing means.
They probably have never even installed PR on any system, let alone have any idea how it works.Harm, why didn't you buy a server from ADK? Well OK, they don't make servers - then not from a customer server shop? (with SuperMicro, Asus, Tyan, EVGA COTS components)? Cheaper, no custom un-molex hell.I needed a system the next day and found nothing cheaper and with faster delivery than Dell as I said:. They have a great price/quality if you select a base system and do not add anything.
My son helps Dell, HP, and a number of other companies with their server problems, not the other way around.I hear you. Without your son, they wouldn't even know how to go about fixing their server problems.Ask your son if there are reasons IT departments buy Dell and HP servers outside of speedy delivery, inertia and legacy reasons. Engineering reasons. Share his response with us, please.Unfortunately Dell, HP, and name a lot of others have no idea what video editing means.That's what this forum and specialty integrators are for?After all, there gotta be a reason Z800 (and before that, xw series) has been the staple of video editing in Windows - for large post houses,.gov, etc. Or the fact that Z800 is the most recommended system for video editing - by Adobe, Avid, Sony, Grass Valley.Regardless - what you said about getting base Tier 1 configurations and adding storage, memory, GPUs yourself - couldn't agree more - unless there is a lot of disposable income. Buying systems from specialty integrators who know their stuff - ditto.(I am seriously off-topic here - sorry about that.). Ask your son if there are reasons IT departments buy Dell and HP servers outside of speedy delivery, inertia and legacy reasons.
Engineering reasons. Share his response with us, please.The resons are simple, single source of supply, corporate rebates, attractive price/quality for the bulk of the users. Reliable machines for everyday office work. Great standardization. Simple roll-out and maintenance.
Single slip-streamed installation. Easy Help desk.But read some of the posts here and you will notice a number of common issues with users that have an IT department lurking around. Problems with slip-streamed installations, user rights, storage policies, lacking hardware, lack of understanding the needs of users, etc.
All too often the IT department does not understand issues, that are raised here because 99% of the employees can use their standard Dell or HP for office applications or accounting without problems. Why would you need administrative rights? Nobody gets them outside IT. Why do you need a different disk configuration? Use the storage server.
You are running out of disk space? Use an external USB disk, we still have a number laying around. Why do you need a nVidia card? Everybody works without problems with the base AMD/ATI card.
You want more memory. Sorry, we have a standard configuration for everybody, including you. We make no exceptions.Sounds familiar? Alex,It can be similar, when a high-end graphics user looks to a standardized computer supplier. They sell and build for 99.0% of the computer users out there. Few have a clue what Photoshop, PrPro, or After Effects even requires.
They have a set menu, with but a few choices.That is why one will see recommendations for companies, like ADK, who understand the programs, and what it takes to build for those programs.Some years ago, I spent some time looking for a custom builder, who was local to me. I interviewed several shops, and not one had a clue what I was talking about. Most of their recs. Were horribly off-base, and in some cases detrimental to using my Adobe programs. They just did not know what I needed, and would tout how many servers they just delivered to Honeywell, or how many desktops they built for AIG.
Finally, I found one fellow, who built specialized systems for medical imaging, and he knew ALL of my Adobe programs.Most folk just do not get it, and that is where this forum becomes very handy indeed.Hunt. I take it, calling Adobe for a referral to a good local integrator - wouldn't be very effective?Back in the pre-FireWire days of Adobe forum being on Compuserve and Bertel Schmitt sysop-ing it, things were simpler, in a way. The main way to get a video editing system was through an authorized VAR, for better or for worse.It would not be very effective because the company itself tends to be biased towards HP and Dell - the 'big corporations' in the PC business.
As such, they tend to favor companues that deliver the poorest bang for the buck (or one that charges the absolute highest price for any given level of performance). Sadly, the local integrators aren't much better these days: They build mostly office configurations with minimal RAM and minimal graphics - and few of them stock any higher-end parts at all whatsoever. And most of the local integrators I've been to recently sell mostly used parts that are two or more generations old and carry few if any current-generation parts.
It would not be very effective because the company itself tends to be biased towards HP and Dell - the 'big corporations' in the PC business. As such, they tend to favor companues that deliver the poorest bang for the buck (or one that charges the absolute highest price for any given level of performance).This sounds like some sort of a sinister conspiracy for Adobe to recommend 'big corporations' for no good reason.This also sounds like you'd have to be absolute bonkers to recommend a Z820.Uhm, a little extreme?I agree with you though that purely on PPBM-score-to-price ratio, the big ones (HP, Dell, Boxx, etc.) trail behind most customs or DIYs. This doesn't mean there is absolutely no good reason to recommend a Z820.Also agree that calling Adobe might not be very effective - probably because their sales reps simply don't know who the good local integrators are - not because they blatantly promote 'big corps'. This also sounds like you'd have to be absolute bonkers to recommend a Z820Not for people with deep wallets.
If your name is Bill Gates or you can charge it to the company account, a HP Z820 is nice. With a single E5-2643 CPU, and a nVidia Quadro 4000, and for the rest very comparable to my own build as it currently stands, the Z820 is only € 7530 versus my costs at € 4125 (but you can easily deduct € 550 from that last amount to make the chassis comparable, so € 3575). Same amount of memory, same SSD's, same BD-R's, similar Gold+ PSU, only HP has a Quadro 4000 and I have a GTX 680/4G and the HP has a simple E5-2643 and I have an i7-3930K. But my system has 15 hot-swappable bays for 3.5' disks and 4 hot-swappable bays for 2.5' drives and a multicard reader included, all missing from the Z820. I have space for 31 3.5'disks, the HP not even a quarter of that. So the conclusion must be that HP is at least twice as expensive as my own build.Why do you think licences for Adobe products are so expensive? To justify the huge costs of their HP systems they demonstrate on every road-show.
Harm, far reaching conclusions based on a single example - that's just not like you. A single socket system against a dual one, capable of up to 512GB ECC RAM? Harm, is that you?At the very least, use similar systems with equal or similar components (a Q4K against a Q4K, not a GTX), and follow by choosing the bare minimum Z820 (or a Z420) config with the right core components, and then add on to that. That may be a GTX-680 or a Q4K, HP or 3rd party memory.Did you have a chance to ask your son if there are engineering reasons to buy an HP or Dell?Nobody asked you to buy your superserver components at a Beverly Hills boutique shop - so why would pitch the most expensive way to configure a Z820, against your DIY single socket build? Harm, is that you?Sure, HP workstations will always cost more than the sum of equal or similar COTS components. There'd be no way to include a 3-year on-site warranty in the price otherwise, or include the same level of R&D and engineering that went into it. At the same time, the total cost is usually within US$1-2K of a similar DIY build - (added) which, by the way, is in line with ADK pricing - for a very, very good reason.The last remark, about the cost of Adobe licenses?
Harm, is that you? At the very least, use similar systems with equal or similar components (a Q4K against a Q4K, not a GTX), and follow by choosing the bare minimum Z820 (or a Z420) config with the right core components, and then add on to that. That may be a GTX-680 or a Q4K, HP or 3rd party memory.The similarity is single hexa core CPU, both 64 GB memory, both dual BD-R burners, both dual 256 GB SSD's, both Gold+ PSU, etc.
There is no alternative for the HP configuration that makes it somewhat similar to my build. The price difference is clear. Even if I were to change my GTX to a Quadro 4000, it would only increase the cost of my system by € 91. Harm,I agree with all of your statements. I have had many clients, who were the only graphics people in larger organizations. They were the 'outcasts,' as far as IT was concerned. They focused on the mass, and the poor users, who needed something different were always completely out of luck.
That does help standardize what the IT department does, and makes the majority of their work more efficient, but at the expense of the one (or few) person, who is doing graphics, or video work. I believe that each of your IT comments has been passed on to me, at one time, or another, and in one form, or another.Well-stated,Hunt. If you remember me I'm the guy who was trying to come up with solutions regarding would PPCS4 run on W7 64bit and would PP CS6 run.
I discovered this not crazy about W7 64 bit. My CS4 would only run a second of video. Before video was not a problem in 1920X1080, I went through every possible change I could make, no good would't run on computer. W7So even though my system did'nt match requirments for CS 6 I installed anyway runs like a dream. With CS4 on my previous XP system I was not able to use m ultiple camera edit ran to slow to work. Using W7 64 CS6 working in muliple camera no problem.With what I use it for no problem this wayHave a good day.
Also, I would like to know exactly which laptop that you're currently using, and what exactly the specs (processor (CPU), RAM, hard drive(s), GPU or integrated graphics) are. After all, if you are running 32-bit Windows because your laptop is simply too old to run 64-bit programs properly (or if the components fall short of Adobe's minimum requirements, such as too little RAM or a CPU that simply cannot run most currently available programs properly), it's definitely time for a new laptop.Remember, the reason why CS5 and higher is 64-bit only is partly due to its tremendous requirements as far as the amount of RAM is concerned.
In fact, CS6 really needs 16GB of RAM - far more RAM than any 32-bit version of Windows can address (remember, the most amount of RAM that 32-bit Windows can address is 3.99GB total minus the 700MB or so that is reserved for hardware interrupt caching) - just to perform acceptably, especially on weaker-performance laptops. And Adobe's official minimum is still 2GB although that amount barely runs Premiere Pro CS6 at all, and you would not have been able to do much if anything at all in that program.And had I given advice about a low-end laptop back then, I would not have picked a model with 32-bit Windows Vista or Windows 7 at all due to their extremely small amount of headroom between Microsoft's minimum RAM requirements (IIRC, Windows 7 requires a minimum of 1GB of RAM just to even run at all - and yet it cannot utilize 4GB of RAM) and the maximum amount of total RAM that it can address. I currently do not have a laptop of any kind. I have 2 desktops, one 12-year-old one I use for the internet and a few other things. The other desktop machine is my gamming machine that I use mainly for video games.
I have premiere on that machine because my internet one can't run it (Too slow, and 32-bit). I want a laptop for basically everything, internet, music, DVDs, premiere, iTunes, some small gaming, etc. I'll be going into collage in a few years, and am probably going to need one. I don't care if it is a little slow with Premiere, all I care is that it will run, and work properly. It's obviously going to run slower than my one machine.
The link that John T. Posted (Reply # 6) will offer two possibilities:ADK (they design computers to run Adobe programs, plus some others) and Sager (they design extreme gaming laptops, but those can be easily adapted to run PrPro, and most other Adobe programs).I currently have an older Sager, but will be going with an ADK to replace it.While those are not the ONLY suppliers, their machines are stout, and extremely powerful. I have had zero issues with the Sager Customer Support, and two of the main folk from ADK, Eric & Scott, post here and in the Hardware Forum constantly. They too offer great Customer Support.Good luck,Hunt.
My computer has Win7 64bit Pro -and- CS5 Master Collection -and- MS Office 2007 Pro -and- a couple dozen or so 'small' utility programs (Imgburn, FTP, etc)I use one computer for everything. No room, or $$, or a 2nd computer. I also have never installed any codecs that did not come with CS5The only game I have installed is pokerstars.com to try and learn Texas Hold'Em (monthly splurge is a small $$ poker tournament at a local card room. And I play online once in awhile to try and get better)I edit ONLY video from my Canon vixia and wife's Flip, and when editing I do nothing else. And I have had ZERO problemsWhile it would be nice to have a dedicated (and faster) video editing computer, not everyone has the space or money to do that.